Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss is the reduction in hearing that arises when the cochlea or the auditory nerve is damaged, rather than when sound is blocked on its way to a healthy inner ear. It is the most common permanent hearing loss in adults, and its causes range from aging and noise to genetic mutation, ototoxic drugs, and sudden idiopathic failure. Because the fault lies in the sensory and neural apparatus itself, both air-conduction and bone-conduction thresholds are elevated together, with no air-bone gap, and the loss is generally permanent and not surgically correctable. This article explains what distinguishes sensorineural from conductive loss, sorts its principal types, describes how the inner ear transduces sound and how that machinery fails, shows how the loss is measured, and examines why it burdens attention, memory, and long-term cognitive health.

Keywords: sensorineural hearing loss, cochlea, hair cells

What Sensorineural Hearing Loss Is

*Sensorineural hearing loss* (SNHL) is hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or the auditory nerve, the sensory and neural links in the chain that carries sound to the brain. It stands in contrast to *conductive hearing loss*, in which the outer or middle ear fails to deliver sound to an otherwise healthy cochlea. The distinction is not merely anatomical: because the machinery that transduces sound into neural signals is itself impaired in SNHL, the loss is usually permanent and cannot be lifted by clearing an obstruction or repairing the eardrum, whereas most conductive losses can be corrected medically or surgically (Cunningham & Tucci, 2017).

Sensorineural loss is by far the most common form of permanent hearing impairment in adults, and hearing loss overall is one of the largest single contributors to years lived with disability worldwide, affecting well over a billion people to some degree (GBD 2019 Hearing Loss Collaborators, 2021). Its causes are heterogeneous: the gradual degeneration of aging, cumulative noise exposure, inherited mutations present from birth, ototoxic medications, and sudden idiopathic failure all converge on the same final common pathway of a damaged cochlea or nerve. What unites them, and what defines the category, is the site of the lesion rather than its origin.

Types of Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Within the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary, sensorineural hearing loss is the parent term (descriptor D006319) for several more specific conditions, each defined by the cause or the site of the sensorineural damage rather than by its severity. The table below lists the direct MeSH subtypes. It is worth stressing that MeSH is an *indexing classification*, built to organize the biomedical literature, not a claim about mechanism; a single patient's loss may belong to more than one of these categories at once, and the boundaries between them are clinical conveniences rather than sharp natural kinds. Sensorineural hearing loss is itself classified in MeSH as a form of the broader category Hearing Loss.

Cutting across this taxonomy is a distinction of tempo that clinicians treat urgently. Most sensorineural loss develops slowly, but *sudden sensorineural hearing loss*, an unexplained drop of at least 30 dB across three contiguous frequencies developing within seventy-two hours, is an otologic emergency, because prompt treatment can sometimes recover hearing that would otherwise be lost for good (Chandrasekhar et al., 2019). At the other end of the lifespan, congenital sensorineural loss present from birth is common enough that universal newborn hearing screening has become standard, catching in the first weeks of life a loss that would otherwise derail speech and language development (Morton & Nance, 2006).

How the Inner Ear Transduces Sound

To see how sensorineural loss happens, it helps to see what has to work. Sound reaching the *cochlea* sets its fluids vibrating, and those vibrations are converted into neural signals by the *hair cells* of the *organ of Corti*. Each hair cell carries a bundle of stereocilia whose deflection opens mechanotransduction channels, turning a mechanical displacement of a few nanometers into an electrical current; the outer hair cells additionally act as an active amplifier, sharpening the ear's sensitivity and frequency tuning (Fettiplace & Hackney, 2006). Because the cochlea is arranged tonotopically, with high frequencies encoded at its base and low at its apex, damage at a given place along it removes a corresponding band of frequencies.

Any link in this chain can fail. The hair cells themselves are vulnerable to noise, ototoxic drugs, and the oxidative and mitochondrial damage that accumulates with age, and once lost in the mammalian cochlea they do not regenerate (Yamasoba et al., 2013). A subtler failure, recognized more recently, is *cochlear synaptopathy*: the loss of the synapses between inner hair cells and auditory-nerve fibers. In a landmark study, noise producing only a temporary threshold shift caused permanent loss of these synapses, adding lasting neural injury long after thresholds had apparently recovered (Kujawa & Liberman, 2009). Because the affected fibers need not raise the pure-tone thresholds an audiogram measures, the deficit was named *hidden hearing loss*, and it accumulates with both noise and age (Kujawa & Liberman, 2015; Liberman & Kujawa, 2017). Study of human temporal bones confirms that this synaptic and neural loss is a prominent feature of the aging ear, present even where hair cells are relatively preserved (Wu et al., 2019). Alongside these, degeneration of the *stria vascularis*, the tissue that maintains the electrical battery driving transduction, and the broad genetic and metabolic pathways of cochlear aging make acquired sensorineural loss genuinely multifactorial (Keithley, 2020; Bowl & Dawson, 2019).

Measuring Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Sensorineural loss is quantified with the *audiogram*, on which an audiologist plots the softest tone a listener can detect at each frequency, in decibels of hearing level (dB HL), by two routes. *Air conduction*, through an earphone, tests the whole pathway from outer ear to brain; *bone conduction*, through a vibrator on the skull, bypasses the outer and middle ear to stimulate the cochlea directly. The comparison is diagnostic. In a sensorineural loss the fault lies in the cochlea or nerve, so both routes are impaired equally and the two curves lie together with no *air-bone gap*; in a conductive loss, bone conduction stays normal while air conduction drops, opening a gap. To summarize a loss in one number, clinicians compute the *pure-tone average*, the mean threshold across the principal speech frequencies, and grade it against standard bands: normal up to about 25 dB HL, mild to 40 dB, moderate to 60 dB, severe to 80 dB, and profound beyond.

The epidemiology of sensorineural loss rests on applying these measures to whole populations. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, audiometrically tested a large community sample of older adults and established both how common hearing loss is and how sharply its prevalence rises with age, along with the noise and cardiovascular risk factors that accelerate it (Cruickshanks et al., 1998). A single audiogram diagnoses an individual; the aggregate of many audiograms measures a public-health problem.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Cognition

Sensorineural loss is not confined to the ear; it reaches into the mind. When speech arrives degraded, the listener must expend extra mental effort to reconstruct the message, and that effort draws on limited cognitive resources. The *Ease of Language Understanding* model formalizes this: when the incoming signal fails to match stored phonological representations, slow, effortful, working-memory-dependent processing is recruited to fill the gap (Ronnberg et al., 2013). The *Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)* extends the idea, treating listening effort as the deliberate allocation of mental resources to a hard listening task, resources then unavailable for encoding and remembering what was heard (Pichora-Fuller et al., 2016).

The population-level consequence is now among the most consequential findings in the field. Longitudinal study first showed that older adults with hearing loss develop dementia at higher rates than their normally-hearing peers, the risk rising in step with the severity of the loss (Lin et al., 2011), and a systematic review and meta-analysis has since confirmed that age-related hearing loss is associated with cognitive impairment and incident dementia across many cohorts (Loughrey et al., 2018). Mechanistic work has begun to trace how a chronically degraded auditory input alters brain structure and function (Slade et al., 2020). On the strength of this evidence, the *Lancet* Commission identified hearing loss as the single largest potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia in midlife, plausibly because years of effortful listening, reduced stimulation, and social withdrawal impoverish the aging brain (Livingston et al., 2020).

Worked Example: Confirming a Sensorineural Loss

Consider an adult who reports that hearing has dulled in both ears and that conversation in noise has become hard. On audiometry, the left ear shows air-conduction thresholds of 35 dB HL at 500 Hz, 45 dB at 1000 Hz, and 55 dB at 2000 Hz, with bone-conduction thresholds equal to the air-conduction values at every frequency. Is this loss sensorineural or conductive, and how severe is it?

The decisive comparison is between the two conduction routes. Because the bone-conduction thresholds equal the air-conduction thresholds at each frequency, there is no air-bone gap: sound reaching the cochlea directly through the skull is heard no better than sound routed through the ear canal and ossicles. That rules out a conductive component and marks the loss as sensorineural, sited in the cochlea or nerve rather than the conducting apparatus. For the severity, the pure-tone average across the three speech frequencies is the mean of 35, 45, and 55 dB, which is 135 divided by 3, or exactly 45 dB HL, placing the loss squarely in the moderate band.

The arithmetic turns three points on a chart into a diagnosis: a moderate, sensorineural loss. It also carries a prognosis the numbers alone do not show. Because the fault lies in damaged sensory and neural tissue that does not repair itself, this loss will not be reversed by medicine or surgery; management turns to amplification with hearing aids and, for severe-to-profound loss, to a cochlear implant that bypasses the failed hair cells to stimulate the auditory nerve directly.

Discussion

Sensorineural hearing loss is a clarifying case for cognitive science because it sits at the junction of a peripheral sensory failure and a central cognitive cost. The peripheral story is now told in the concrete vocabulary of hair cells, synapses, and the strial battery, and the diagnostic logic, the absence of an air-bone gap, follows directly from where the lesion sits. Yet the burden patients actually report, the exhausting work of following conversation, is a cognitive one, and it is not fully predicted by the audiogram. The gap between what the audiogram measures and what the listener experiences is where cochlear synaptopathy and the demands of effortful listening live, and it is why a purely peripheral account of sensorineural loss is incomplete (Slade et al., 2020).

The most consequential shift in how the condition is understood is its reframing from a fixed sensory deficit to a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline. That the loss is permanent does not mean it is untreatable: hearing aids restore audibility, and for the most severe losses the cochlear implant is one of the signal successes of modern medicine, converting sound into patterned electrical stimulation of the surviving auditory nerve and returning useful hearing, and often open-set speech understanding, to people who were profoundly deaf (Wilson & Dorman, 2008). If a degraded auditory signal contributes causally to dementia risk, the stakes of providing that treatment rise from convenience to cognitive health (Livingston et al., 2020; Cunningham & Tucci, 2017).

Current Directions

The sharpest current question is whether treating hearing loss can protect cognition. The ACHIEVE study, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial, tested a best-practice hearing intervention against a health-education control in older adults; while it did not slow cognitive decline in the healthy-volunteer sample overall, it produced a marked reduction in decline within the subgroup at higher baseline risk, sharpening rather than settling the causal question and pointing to who stands to benefit most (Lin et al., 2023).

A second frontier is the biology of hidden hearing loss. If cochlear synaptopathy degrades hearing in noise before it ever moves the audiogram, then the standard pure-tone test is systematically blind to an early and possibly reversible stage of sensorineural decline (Liberman & Kujawa, 2017). Efforts to develop clinical measures sensitive to synaptic loss, and the longer-term prospect of regenerating lost hair cells or protecting them from oxidative and mitochondrial injury, hold out the hope of one day treating sensorineural loss at its source rather than only compensating for it after the fact (Bowl & Dawson, 2019; Keithley, 2020).

Common Misconceptions

Sensorineural hearing loss can be cured with surgery.

Because the damage is in the sensory and neural tissue of the cochlea and nerve, the loss is generally permanent; unlike most conductive loss, it is managed with amplification or a cochlear implant rather than reversed by surgery (Cunningham & Tucci, 2017).

A normal audiogram rules out sensorineural damage.

Cochlear synaptopathy can destroy auditory-nerve synapses without raising pure-tone thresholds, a hidden hearing loss the standard audiogram misses (Kujawa & Liberman, 2015).

It just makes everything quieter.

Sensorineural loss distorts as well as attenuates, degrading frequency resolution so that speech becomes hard to understand, especially in noise, in a way that simply raising the volume does not fix (Fettiplace & Hackney, 2006).

It is purely a problem of the ear.

A degraded signal forces effortful listening that consumes working-memory resources, and hearing loss is the largest modifiable midlife risk factor for dementia identified by the Lancet Commission (Pichora-Fuller et al., 2016; Livingston et al., 2020).

Glossary

Air-bone gap.

The difference between air-conduction and bone-conduction thresholds; it is absent in a pure sensorineural loss and present in a conductive loss.

Audiogram.

A chart of the softest sound a person can hear at each frequency, plotted for air and bone conduction, used to classify and grade a hearing loss.

Bone conduction.

Testing hearing by vibrating the skull directly, bypassing the outer and middle ear to stimulate the cochlea and isolate the sensorineural component.

Cochlea.

The fluid-filled, spiral organ of the inner ear that converts mechanical vibration into neural signals, arranged tonotopically from high frequencies at its base to low at its apex.

Cochlear implant.

A surgically implanted device that bypasses damaged hair cells to stimulate the auditory nerve electrically, restoring useful hearing in severe-to-profound sensorineural loss.

Cochlear synaptopathy.

The loss of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory-nerve fibers, which can occur while the hair cells survive and while pure-tone thresholds remain normal.

Hair cells.

The sensory receptor cells of the organ of Corti; outer hair cells amplify faint sounds and inner hair cells drive the auditory nerve. In mammals they do not regenerate once lost.

Hidden hearing loss.

A deficit in hearing, especially in noise, caused by synaptic or neural loss that the standard audiogram fails to detect.

Listening effort.

The deliberate allocation of mental resources to understand a degraded speech signal, drawing on working memory.

Organ of Corti.

The sensory epithelium on the basilar membrane of the cochlea that houses the hair cells.

Ototoxicity.

Damage to the cochlea or auditory nerve caused by certain drugs, such as some antibiotics and chemotherapy agents, a common cause of acquired sensorineural loss.

Pure-tone average.

The mean of the hearing thresholds across the principal speech frequencies, used to grade the severity of a hearing loss.

Sensorineural hearing loss.

Hearing loss originating in the cochlea or auditory nerve rather than the conducting pathway; the most common form of permanent hearing loss in adults.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

An unexplained drop of at least 30 dB across three contiguous frequencies within seventy-two hours, treated as an otologic emergency.

Tonotopy.

The orderly mapping of sound frequency to place along the cochlea, so that damage at a given location removes a corresponding band of frequencies.

Key Researchers

Karen J. Cruickshanks

An epidemiologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who leads the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study in the Beaver Dam cohort, establishing the prevalence and risk factors of sensorineural hearing loss in older adults.
Faculty page

Robert Fettiplace

An auditory neuroscientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison whose work on cochlear hair cells illuminated mechanotransduction and the electrical and mechanical tuning that make the inner ear so sensitive.
ORCID - Faculty page - Wikipedia

A. J. Hudspeth

(1945-2025). A neuroscientist and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at The Rockefeller University who elucidated how the hair bundle transduces mechanical stimuli, defining the biophysics of hearing at the level of the single hair cell.
Faculty page - Wikipedia

Sharon G. Kujawa

An auditory neuroscientist at Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School who, with M. Charles Liberman, discovered cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of auditory-nerve synapses that precedes hair-cell death in noise and aging.
Faculty page - Wikipedia

M. Charles Liberman

An auditory physiologist at Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, co-discoverer of cochlear synaptopathy, who named the resulting deficit hidden hearing loss and mapped its manifestations and mechanisms.
ORCID - Faculty page - Wikipedia

Christine Petit

A geneticist at the Institut Pasteur and the Collège de France whose work identified many of the genes whose mutation causes hereditary sensorineural deafness, including forms of Usher syndrome, founding the molecular genetics of deafness.
Faculty page - Wikipedia

Karen P. Steel

A geneticist at King's College London whose mouse-genetic studies identified genes underlying deafness and the mechanisms of hair-cell and cochlear dysfunction, linking genotype to sensorineural phenotype.
ORCID - Faculty page - Wikipedia

Blake S. Wilson

An engineer at Duke University whose continuous-interleaved-sampling processing strategy transformed the cochlear implant into a device that restores open-set speech understanding, recognized with the 2013 Lasker-DeBakey Award.
Faculty page - Wikipedia

Frequently Asked Questions

What is sensorineural hearing loss?

It is hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or the auditory nerve, rather than to the sound-conducting outer or middle ear, and it is the most common form of permanent hearing loss in adults (Cunningham & Tucci, 2017).

How is it different from conductive hearing loss?

In sensorineural loss the cochlea or nerve is damaged, so air and bone conduction are impaired together with no air-bone gap; in conductive loss the inner ear is healthy but sound is blocked, so bone conduction stays normal while air conduction drops (Cunningham & Tucci, 2017).

What causes it?

Aging, cumulative noise exposure, inherited genetic mutations, ototoxic drugs, and sudden idiopathic loss all damage the cochlea or auditory nerve, converging on the same sensorineural pathway (Yamasoba et al., 2013; Morton & Nance, 2006).

Can it be cured?

Generally not, because the sensory and neural tissue does not repair itself; it is managed with hearing aids and, for severe-to-profound loss, a cochlear implant that stimulates the auditory nerve directly (Wilson & Dorman, 2008).

What is sudden sensorineural hearing loss?

An unexplained loss of at least 30 dB across three contiguous frequencies within seventy-two hours; it is an otologic emergency because prompt treatment can sometimes recover hearing (Chandrasekhar et al., 2019).

What is hidden hearing loss?

A loss of auditory-nerve synapses, cochlear synaptopathy, that degrades hearing in noise while leaving the pure-tone audiogram normal, so the standard test does not detect it (Kujawa & Liberman, 2015; Liberman & Kujawa, 2017).

Is sensorineural hearing loss linked to dementia?

Hearing loss is associated with higher rates of cognitive decline and dementia and is the largest modifiable midlife risk factor identified by the Lancet Commission, plausibly through years of effortful listening and reduced engagement (Lin et al., 2011; Livingston et al., 2020).

Does treating hearing loss protect cognition?

It is being actively tested. The ACHIEVE randomized trial found no overall slowing of cognitive decline but a marked benefit in a higher-risk subgroup, so the question of who benefits is being refined rather than closed (Lin et al., 2023).

References

Morton, C. C., & Nance, W. E. (2006). Newborn hearing screening—A silent revolution. New England Journal of Medicine, 354(20), 2151-2164. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra050700

Fettiplace, R., & Hackney, C. M. (2006). The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1828

Wilson, B. S., & Dorman, M. F. (2008). Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hearing Research, 242(1-2), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.005

Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14077-14085. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009

Cruickshanks, K. J., Wiley, T. L., Tweed, T. S., Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Mares-Perlman, J. A., & Nondahl, D. M. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148(9), 879-886. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713

Lin, F. R., Metter, E. J., O'Brien, R. J., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., & Ferrucci, L. (2011). Hearing loss and incident dementia. Archives of Neurology, 68(2), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362

Yamasoba, T., Lin, F. R., Someya, S., Kashio, A., Sakamoto, T., & Kondo, K. (2013). Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: Epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hearing Research, 303, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.021

Ronnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sorqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlstrom, O., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Rudner, M. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031

Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2015). Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing Research, 330(Pt B), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009

Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S. E., Eckert, M. A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B. W. Y., Humes, L. E., Lemke, U., Lunner, T., Matthen, M., Mackersie, C. L., Naylor, G., Phillips, N. A., Richter, M., Rudner, M., Sommers, M. S., Tremblay, K. L., & Wingfield, A. (2016). Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, 37(Suppl 1), 5S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312

Liberman, M. C., & Kujawa, S. G. (2017). Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms. Hearing Research, 349, 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.003

Cunningham, L. L., & Tucci, D. L. (2017). Hearing loss in adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(25), 2465-2473. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1616601

Loughrey, D. G., Kelly, M. E., Kelley, G. A., Brennan, S., & Lawlor, B. A. (2018). Association of age-related hearing loss with cognitive function, cognitive impairment, and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 144(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2513

Bowl, M. R., & Dawson, S. J. (2019). Age-related hearing loss. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 9(8), a033217. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a033217

Wu, P. Z., Liberman, L. D., Bennett, K., de Gruttola, V., O'Malley, J. T., & Liberman, M. C. (2019). Primary neural degeneration in the human cochlea: Evidence for hidden hearing loss in the aging ear. Neuroscience, 407, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053

Chandrasekhar, S. S., Tsai Do, B. S., Schwartz, S. R., Bontempo, L. J., Faucett, E. A., Finestone, S. A., Hollingsworth, D. B., Kelley, D. M., Kmucha, S. T., Moonis, G., Poling, G. L., Roberts, J. K., Stachler, R. J., Zeitler, D. M., Corrigan, M. D., Nnacheta, L. C., & Satterfield, L. (2019). Clinical practice guideline: Sudden hearing loss (update). Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 161(1_suppl), S1-S45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819859885

Keithley, E. M. (2020). Pathology and mechanisms of cochlear aging. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 98(9), 1674-1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24439

Slade, K., Plack, C. J., & Nuttall, H. E. (2020). The effects of age-related hearing loss on the brain and cognitive function. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(10), 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.07.005

Livingston, G., Huntley, J., Sommerlad, A., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Brayne, C., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Cooper, C., Costafreda, S. G., Dias, A., Fox, N., Gitlin, L. N., Howard, R., Kales, H. C., Kivimaki, M., Larson, E. B., Ogunniyi, A., ... Mukadam, N. (2020). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. The Lancet, 396(10248), 413-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6

GBD 2019 Hearing Loss Collaborators. (2021). Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 397(10278), 996-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00516-X

Lin, F. R., Pike, J. R., Albert, M. S., Arnold, M., Burgard, S., Chisolm, T., Couper, D., Deal, J. A., Goman, A. M., Glynn, N. W., Gmelin, T., Gravens-Mueller, L., Hayden, K. M., Huang, A. R., Knopman, D., Mitchell, C. M., Mosley, T., Pankow, J. S., Reed, N. S., ... Coresh, J. (2023). Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 402(10404), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01406-X